Pesquisa de satisfação como ferramenta para mapear a percepção de stakeholders primários de um laboratório

Satisfaction survey as a tool to map the perception of a laboratory's primary stakeholders

Authors

  • Douglas Murillo Marrara FUNDUNESP
  • Ana Paula Dário Zocca MBA/ESALQ

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.22167/2675-441X-2022059

Keywords:

indicadores, meio de comunicação, relacionamento

Abstract

Marketing is present everywhere, as the consumerism of modern society is the result of an exchange relationship that involves communication, prices, distribution and products. The offer of services that satisfy the target market and that reach the organization's objectives can be achieved by marketing, being the perception mapping one of the tools used through the marketing research. One way to build a competitive advantage for the company is based on a vision based on the superior management of the stakeholders, where a network of interested publics sees the company as the center, obtaining a competitive advantage in relationships and communication. In this context, the general objective of the study was to map the perception of the primary stakeholders of a laboratory at a University in the interior of São Paulo and the specific objective was to apply a marketing survey on satisfaction in relation to the services provided. The study methodology was descriptive and quantitative with data collection through a structured questionnaire applied to 1361 members of the University, obtaining 72 responses. As a result, opportunities were found to improve satisfaction in relation to the physical structure of the laboratory, the recognition of the areas of activity and, consequently, the means of accessing this information. Based on these results, the indicators will be presented to the laboratory and an action plan will be created to help solve problems and achieve desired results.

References

Berry L. Big ideas in services marketing. J Consum Mark. 1986; 3(2): 47-51. doi.org/10.1108/eb008162

Kotler P.; Armstrong G. Princípios de “marketing”. 12ed. 2007. Pearson Prentice Hall, São Paulo, SP, Brasil.

American Marketing Association (AMA). Definitions of marketing. AMA; 2017. Disponível em: <https://www.ama.org/the-definition-of-marketing-what-is-marketing/>.

Las Casas A.L. Administração de Marketing. 2ed. 2019. Atlas, Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brasil. Disponível em: <https://integrada.minhabiblioteca.com.br/books/9788597020151>.

Rocha T.; Goldschmidt A. Gestão dos stakeholders: como gerenciar o relacionamento e a comunicação entre a empresa e seus públicos de interesse. 2010. Saraiva, São Paulo, SP, Brasil. Disponível em: <https://integrada.minhabiblioteca.com.br/books/9788502117181>.

Harrison J.S. Administração estratégica de recursos e relacionamentos. 2005. Bookman, Porto Alegre, RS, Brasil.

Clarkson M. A stakeholder framework for analyzing and evaluating corporate social performance. Acad Manage Rev.20(1): 1995; 20(1): 92-117. doi.org/10.3138/9781442673496-013

Hourneaux Júnior F.; Siqueira J.P.L.; Talles R.; Corrêa H.L. Análise dos stakeholders das empresas industriais do estado de São Paulo. ver. Adm. 2014; 49(1): 158-170.

Pride W.M.; Ferrel O.C. Fundamentos de marketing: conceitos e práticas. 2016. Cengage Learning Brasil, São Paulo, SP, Brasil. Disponível em: <https://integrada.minhabiblioteca.com.br/books/9788522124053>.

Mcdaniel C.; Gates R. Fundamentos de pesquisa de marketing. 4ed. 2005. LTC, Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brasil. Disponível em: <https://integrada.minhabiblioteca.com.br/books/978-85-216-2373-1>.

Instituto Semesp. Mapa do Ensino Superior no Brasil. 11ed.2021. Semesp. Disponível em: https://www.semesp.org.br/mapa-do-ensino-superior/edicao-11/dados-estados-e-regioes/ sudeste/sao-paulo/.

Marques J.R.Qual a diferença entre comunicação direta e indireta? IBC; 2019. Disponível em: <https://www.ibccoaching.com.br/portal/qual-diferenca-entre-comunicacao-direta-e-indireta/>.

Marques J.R. Comunicação Interpessoal nas Organizações. IBC; 2019. Disponível em: <https://www.ibccoaching.com.br/portal/coaching-carreira/comunicacao-interpessoal-nas-organizacoes/>.

Carballar J.A. Social Media. Marketing personal y profesional. 2012. RC libros, San Fernando de Henares, Madrid, Espanha.

Kotler P.; Keller K.L. Administração de marketing. 12ed. 2006. Pearson Prentice Hall. São Paulo, SP, Brasil.

Lekhawichit, N. et al. 2021. The Impact of Service Quality on the Customer Satisfaction: Mediating Role of Waiting Time. Psychology and Education Journal, 58 (2): 3113-3125. doi.org/10.17762/pae.v58i2.2552

American Customer Satisfaction Index (ACSI). Benchmarks By Sector. ACSI; 2021. Disponível em: <https://www.theacsi.org/acsi-benchmarks/benchmarks-by-sector>.

Kotler P. Administração de marketing: Análise, Planejamento, Implementação e Controle. 2000. Pearson, Prentice Hall. São Paulo, SP, Brasil.

Published

2022-11-14

How to Cite

Marrara, D. M., & Dário Zocca, A. P. (2022). Pesquisa de satisfação como ferramenta para mapear a percepção de stakeholders primários de um laboratório: Satisfaction survey as a tool to map the perception of a laboratory’s primary stakeholders. Quaestum, 3, 1–8. https://doi.org/10.22167/2675-441X-2022059

Issue

Section

Article